header6header6logooheader6
  • Journal Information
    • About Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Ethical Standards
    • Open Access Policy
    • Reviewer Procedure
    • Abstracted
      and Indexed
    • Contact
  • For Authors
  • Submit Article
  • Curent Issue & Archive
    • Archive
  • Publisher
✕

Magazine - December 2022 (87) 4

Pain management in total knee arthroplasty. A comprehensive review

Pain management in total knee arthroplasty. A comprehensive review

Leczenie bólu po zabiegu całkowitej endoprotezoplastyki stawu kolanowego. Kompleksowy przegląd badań

Authors: | Małgorzata Domagalska
1
| Tomasz Reysner
1
|
1 Chair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

Received: 28/10/2022

Accepted: 12/11/2022

Published: 30/12/2022

DOI: 10.31139/chnriop.2022.87.4.6

Review
Read moreDownload PDF

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common surgeries performed to relieve joint pain in patients
with end-stage osteoarthritis or rheumatic arthritis of the knee. However, TKA is followed by moderate
to severe postoperative pain that affects postoperative rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall
outcomes. Historically, opioids have been widely used for the perioperative pain management of TKA.
However, opioids are associated with undesirable adverse effects, such as nausea, respiratory depression,
and urine retention, which limit their application in daily clinical practice. This review aimed to discuss
the current postoperative pain management regimens for TKA. Our review of literature demonstrated
that multimodal analgesia is considered the optimal regimen for perioperative pain management of
TKA and improves clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, through a combination of several types of
medications, including preemptive analgesia, especially local infiltration analgesia and peripheral nerve
blockade. Multimodal analgesia provides superior pain relief, promotes knee recovery, and reduces opioid
consumption and related adverse effects in patients undergoing TKA.

Keywords: | total knee arthroplasty | multimodal analgesia | pain | IPACK block | adductor canal block | periarticular injections |

Streszczenie

Całkowita alloplastyka stawu kolanowego (TKA) jest jedną z najczęściej wykonywanych operacji w
celu złagodzenia bólu stawów kolanowych u pacjentów ze schyłkową chorobą zwyrodnieniową lub
reumatycznym zapaleniem stawu kolanowego. Ból pooperacyjny występujący po alloplastyce stawu
kolanowego ma nasilenie od umiarkowanego do ciężkiego, co wpływa na rehabilitację pooperacyjną,
zadowolenie pacjenta i ogólne wyniki leczenia. W przeszłości opioidy były szeroko stosowane w
leczeniu bólu okołooperacyjnego po TKA. Jednak stosowanie opioidów wiąże się z różnymi działaniami
niepożądanymi, takimi jak nudności, depresja oddechowa czy zatrzymanie moczu, co ogranicza ich
zastosowanie w codziennej praktyce klinicznej. Celem tej pracy było omówienie aktualnych schematów
leczenia bólu pooperacyjnego po TKA. Nasz przegląd piśmiennictwa wykazał, że analgezja multimodalna
jest uważana za optymalny sposób leczenia bólu okołooperacyjnego po TKA. Ta metoda leczenia dzięki
połączeniu kilku rodzajów leków o różnych mechanizmach działania, a także stosowaniu analgezji z
wyprzedzeniem, a zwłaszcza analgezji regionalnej, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem blokad nerwów
obwodowych, zapewnia doskonałą ulgę w bólu, sprzyja regeneracji stawu kolanowego oraz zmniejsza
zużycie opioidów i związane z nimi działania niepożądane u pacjentów poddawanych TKA.

Słowa kluczowe: | całkowita endoprotezoplastyka kolana | analgezja multimodalna | ból | blokada IPACK | blokada kanału przywodzicieli | iniekcje okołostawowe |

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly performed in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis or rheumatic arthritis of the knee to relieve joint pain, increase mobility, and improve quality of life. However, TKA is followed by moderate to severe postoperative pain and remains a significant clinical challenge [1]. Establishing optimal pain management requires a continuous re-evaluation of available data. After general or spinal anesthesia, the analgesic regimen often consists of epidural, intrathecal, and patient-controlled analgesia. Oral and intravenous opioids also continue to play a primary role in postoperative pain relief due to their effectiveness in relieving moderate to severe pain. However, because of their unfavorable side-effect profile [2], combinations of newer alternative therapies, mainly peripheral nerve blocks such as the IPACK and Adductor Canal Block, and periarticular injections have been used to replace frequent opioid use [3]. The purpose of this review was to summarize the data on the efficacy of commonly used modalities for the management of immediate postoperative pain following TKA.
Materials and methods

The literature was reviewed through four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The search was performed in July 2022 by two authors (M.D. and T.R.). We evaluated studies published between 2017 and 2022 using the following search terms: “pain management” (title), “total knee arthroplasty” (title), and “pain control” (title). The titles, abstracts, and full texts of published studies were screened. As a result, only randomized controlled trials were included in this review. This entire process is depicted in Figure 1.
Results

The initial search yielded 415 articles. Eighty-seven relevant articles were ultimately selected based on relevance, recentness, quality of search and citations.

Discussion

Multimodal analgesia
With the exploration of the mechanisms underlying postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it has been verified that both peripheral and central mechanisms are involved. Therefore, monotherapy alone is not enough to provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief after TKA. At present, multimodal analgesia is considered the optimal method for perioperative pain management of TKA through targeting numerous pain pathways. Multimodal analgesia includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative analgesic regimens, aiming to maximize analgesic efficacy through the combination of several analgesic regimens while minimizing undesired adverse effects [4]. Adequate preemptive analgesia could prevent pain nociceptors from entering a state of hyperalgesia, and make acute postoperative pain easier to control, ultimately reducing opioid consumption. A preoperative IPACK block performed by an anesthetist and intraoperative local infiltration analgesia (LIA) that is performed by a surgeon near the conclusion of a procedure, directly prevent the generation and conduction of pain signals from the incision [5]. Several medicines are available for LIA during the surgery, which will be discussed in detail later. Postoperatively, multimodal analgesia includes pharmacologic agents, neuraxial anesthesia, and PNB, each of which will be described below. Compared with monotherapy, multimodal analgesia provides superior postoperative pain relief to promote the recovery of the knee and reduce opioid consumption and related side effects. Consequently, multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for perioperative pain control in patients undergoing TKA [6].

Preoperative analgesic regimens
Pre-emptive analgesia
Pre-emptive analgesia is defined as an antinociceptive intervention that starts before a surgical procedure. It is intended to prevent peripheral and central hypersensitivity, decrease the incidence of hyperalgesia, and reduce the intensity of postoperative pain. It also increases the pain threshold, contributing to the lower postoperative application of analgesic medication [7].

Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids are widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to relieve postoperative pain and prevent postoperative nausea [10,11]. Gasbjerg et al., [8] randomized 485 adult participants to receive 16 mg dexamethasone, given preoperatively and after 24 h, reduced morphine consumption (p < 0.017) at 48 h postoperatively. Chi Wing Chan et al., [9] evaluated that 16mg of dexamethasone given before TKA led to a reduction in postoperative pain (p = 0.005), and less opioid consumption (-6,4 mg; p = 0.025), with stronger quadricep muscle power, compared to 8 mg Dexamethasone. However, he did not observe long-term improvement in reduction in the pain and function of the knee.

NSAIDs
NSAIDs include a range of different analgesics, like commonly used ones: ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketorolac, and parecoxib. NSAIDs are widely used as one of the basic drugs in multimodal analgesia due to its proven reduction of opioid consumption [12-14]. Laoruengthana et al., [15] compared the analgesic effect between ketorolac and parecoxib. Both NSAIDs provide comparable analgesic effects, but the use of parecoxib is associated with significantly less blood loss (Hb g/dl -1.76 vs -1.35, p = 0.01).

Acetaminophen
The efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal pain management in patients undergoing TKA is controversial. Murata-Ooiwa et al., [16] proved that even in the setting of multimodal pain management including the periarticular multidrug injection, intravenous acetaminophen provided better pain relief. However, O’Neal et al. [17] randomized 174 patients to receive that intravenous and oral acetaminophen did not provide additional analgesia in the immediate postoperative period when administered as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia. Despite all Lubis et al., [18] use of perioperative combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen proved that it reduced total morphine requirement (7.5 vs 15.0 vs 9.0; p = 0.391) and provided adequate pain control compared with the administration of a paracetamol or an ibuprofen injection alone.

Buprenorphine
Recently, transdermal buprenorphine patches have been used successfully for postoperative pain control after many kinds of surgery. Xu et al., [19] evaluated that the use of the transdermal buprenorphine TDB patch provides effective pain relief (VAS:7.6 vs 8.1 (p = 0.001)) and reduces the requirement for rescue morphine (4.6 vs 6.3 mg; (p < 0.05) without increasing the side effects in comparison with oral celecoxib during the early post-operative stage following TKA. Also, Londhe et al., [20] randomized 200 patients aged 60-75 years to receive the TDB patch is more efficacious in reducing postoperative pain (VAS: mean of 3 on day 1 to 1 on day 7; p = 0.0083) and can be safely used with fewer systemic side effects when compared to conventional analgesics.
Intraoperative analgesic regimens
Local infiltration analgesia (LIA)
LIA is performed by a surgeon intraoperatively without specialist equipment, commonly near the conclusion of the procedure [21]. Local anesthetic combined with opioids, antibiotics, NSAID, or epinephrine are injected into periarticular regions, including the posterior capsule, collateral ligaments, capsular incision, the quadriceps tendon, and subcutaneous tissues, which directly prevents the generation and conduction of pain signals from the incision. Common LIA cocktails are listed in Table 1.
As shown in the table there is still no consensus on the optimal composition of LIA. Multimodal cocktail injections comprising corticosteroids are the most suggested adjuvant (Tab. 1). Nevertheless, Peng et al., [46] demonstrated that the addition of betamethasone to an LIA has no additional effectiveness.
Also, using liposomal bupivacaine did not bring significant clinical benefit over the standard of care in TKA [47–50]. However, Dysart et al., [51] randomized 139 patients to receive that LIA with 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine hydrochloric was associated with a 91% reduction in opioid consumption (p = 0.009) and pain intensity (p = 0.142) after TKA compared with bupivacaine hydrochloric alone.
Over recent years, different researchers have added different adjuvants to LIA cocktails.
Not all are equally effective in relieving postoperative pain. Adding morphine [29,31,39,40] or epinephrine [41,42] into an analgesic cocktail of LIA does not improve early pain relief or accelerate functional recovery or provide clinical benefits for TKA patients.
Recent studies have shown that LIA combined with ACB [24,25] or FNB [1] has addictive effects on pain relief and opioid consumption after TKA. On the other hand, Mayr et al., [43] evaluated that there is no significant difference in pain relief comparing LIA to continuous peripheral nerve blocks in perioperative pain management. However, Wang et al., [44] suggested that a visualized nerve block, performed by a surgeon, through a minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach distal to the adductor canal, combined with LIA, is more effective than simple per-articular infiltration analgesia in providing pain relief (p < 0.05) after TKA.
There is no consensus on the optimal timeframe of periarticular LIA in TKA. Laoruengthana et al., [45] revealed that postoperative pain reduction and the functional recovery of TKA with early (just after the knee arthrotomy) and late (before prosthetic implantation) LIA administration were not significantly different.
As an essential component of multimodal analgesia approaches after TKA, LIA can be classified into peri-articular injections and intra-articular injections according to administration techniques. Cheng et al., [30] randomized 60 patients to receive that the peri-articular injection had a superior performance of pain relief (NRS:0.68 vs 2.63; p <. 0.001) and improvement of range of motion to the intra-articular injection.
However, among the patients undergoing TKA, those who received intraoperative LIA, improved pain scores and comparable satisfaction levels, with reduced total narcotic consumption in the early postoperative period [32-38].

IPACK block
The IPACK – Ultrasound-guided infiltration of local anesthetic between the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee provides effective motor-sparing knee analgesia for total knee arthroplasty [52,53]. Recent studies have shown that IPACK combines with ACB has additive effects on pain relief and opioid consumption after TKA [23,54-56]. Kim et al., [23] randomized 86 patients to receive that the addition of IPACK and ACB to PAI significantly improves analgesia (NRS -3.5 vs -1.0; p < 0.001) and reduces opioid consumption (p = 0.005), compared with PAI alone. On the other hand, Kampitak et al., [57] evaluated that IPACK did not provide any superior postoperative analgesia or improvement in immediate functional performance. However, it resulted in lower opioid consumption (0.0 vs 0.2; p = 0.008) postoperatively when compared with intraoperative PAI. Vichainarong et al., (58) added IPACK to LIA and continuous ACB and found that it did not reduce postoperative opioid consumption or improve analgesia.
These studies suggest that the IPACK block performed by an anesthesiologist is similar to LIA performed by a surgeon and might be used interchangeably.

Postoperative analgesic regimens
Peripheral Nerve Block
Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used for surgical anesthesia as well as for both postoperative and nonsurgical analgesia. But motor weakness is the most sensitive objective indicator of functional recovery after TKA. The sciatic nerve block [22,59] is an effective adjunctive technique for early postoperative pain control, without an increase in motor weakness. Adductor canal blocks are an alternative to femoral nerve blocks [60,61] because they do not impact quadricep strength. On the other hand, Lim et al., [62] did not find statistically significant differences in analgesic effects, quadricep strength, or functional recovery postoperatively between ACB and FNB.
ACB theoretically does not have enough analgesic effects on posterior sensory nerves. LIA increased its analgesic effect on the posterolateral knee. LIA combined with ACB reduced opioid requirements [63-65]. On the other hand, Meftah et al., [66] compared ACB to LIA and showed there was no difference (p = 0.91) regarding the accumulative daily converted morphine equivalent consumption or total consumption. Kampitak et al., [67] revealed that an obturator nerve block or a tibial nerve block combined with continuous ACB, and LIA was superior to ACB and LIA alone in improving analgesia (p = 0.006), opioid consumption (3.4 vs 6.0; p < 0.001) and functional outcomes in the immediate postoperative period after TKA. Choi et al., [68] concluded that the addition of magnesium to local anesthetic in ACB decreases pain scores (VAS:5.1 vs 3.5; p = 0.000) and opioid consumption (33.2 vs 21.3; p = 0.003), without increasing nausea when compared with ACB with local anesthetic alone. Biswas et al., [69] suggested an improved analgesic profile in the first 48 hours postoperatively when both an adductor canal block and low-dose intrathecal 100 mcg morphine are added to local infiltration analgesia.
Wang et al., [70] explored the efficacy of two unique combinations of nerve blocks on postoperative pain and functional outcome after TKA. He concluded that adding a sham obturator nerve block, a sham lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block, and a sham lateral femoral cutaneous block to ACB and the IPACK block reduced morphine consumption (11.2 vs 17.2; p = 0.001) compared to ACB and IPACK alone. However, the absolute change in morphine consumption, VAS scores, and QoR-15 scores did not exceed minimal clinically important differences. Similarly, Li et al., [71] randomized 200 patients and received that combining ACB with both an iPACK and a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block is an effective method for decreasing early postoperative pain (p < 0.05) in TKA without increasing complications or affecting early rehabilitation.

Continuous peripheral nerve block
More and more reports have appeared in recent years that single-shot PNB provides effective analgesia in the first 24 hours after TKA, but the duration of analgesia does not cover the entire period of moderate to severe pain. That is why recent studies emphasize continuous PNB, especially ACB [72] because continuous FNB impaired mobilization capability due to the weakness of the quadricep muscle. [73-75].
There is a growing body of evidence in favor of continuous ACB [76], especially combined with IPACK [77] or LIA for TKA, because it provides superior ambulation, lower pain scores, faster discharge, and greater patient satisfaction when compared to epidural anesthesia [78,79]. On the other hand, Elkassabany et al., [80] randomized 156 patients to receive that there were no benefits for a continuous adductor canal block for 48 hours in terms of reducing the number of patients with moderate pain and improving the quality of pain management.
A continuous adductor canal block provides postoperative analgesia while preserving quadricep strength. However, there have been inconsistencies regarding the optimal location for a continuous catheter block. Lee et al., [81] showed that a continuous femoral triangle, a proximal adductor canal, and distal adductor canal blocks in the setting of periarticular local anesthetic infiltration provide comparable postoperative analgesia after TKA. Also, Chuan et al., [82] showed that there were no differences in immediate postoperative functional mobility, analgesia, and opioid consumption provided by catheters inserted into the femoral triangle or adductor canal compartment.
Kim et al., [83] compared two methods of insertion of a catheter for a continuous nerve block. He randomized 70 patients to receive that the catheter-over-needle method was able to shorten the procedure time while reducing the incidence of leakage at the catheter insertion site to the catheter-through-needle method (p < 0.5), and showed similar effects in postoperative pain management.
Recently some researchers have added different adjuvants to local anesthetics used for peripheral nerve blocks. Turner et al., [84] in his randomized, controlled, equivalency trial compared a multimodal single-injection adductor canal block (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 1.67 mcg/mL of clonidine, 2 mg of dexamethasone, 150 mcg of buprenorphine, and 2.5 mcg/mL of epinephrine) with a continuous adductor canal block (20 mL 0.25% of bupivacaine injection with 2.5 mcg/mL of epinephrine followed by an 8 mL/h infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine continued through postoperative day 2) and came to the conclusion that a multimodal single-injection adductor canal block provides equivalent analgesia (NRS:5.5 vs 5.7) for up to 36 hours after block placement when compared to a continuous adductor canal block. On the other hand, Lee et al., [85] randomized 177 patients to receive that a single injection of ACB, with and without dexamethasone, is non-inferior to ACB catheters in 24-hour opioid consumption (24.2 vs 21), and may be an attractive option for early- discharge, fast-track TKA.
Perioperative regional anesthesia protects from persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) and improves outcomes after TKA. Bugada et al., [86] randomized 563 patients to conclude that continuous regional anesthesia (an epidural or a peripheral nerve block) provided analgesic benefits for up to 1 month post surgery but did not influence PPSP at 6 months (21.6% of patients experienced PPSP). Better pain control at 1 month was associated with reduced PPSP compared with a single shot peripheral nerve block.

Alternative pain management techniques
The use of complementary and alternative medicine has become popular worldwide over recent years. Mishra et al., [87] evaluated that conventional genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GN-RFA) of the superior lateral, superior medial and inferior medial genicular nerves, when performed before TKA, did not provide any clinically significant pain relief or improvement in functional status at 2 or 6 weeks postoperatively. Thijs et al., [88] randomized sixty patients to receive that postoperative computer-assisted cryotherapy (CAC) can be of added value in patients following an outpatient surgery pathway for TKA, resulting in reduced experienced pain (NRS: 0.9 vs 0.7; p = 0.008) and opioid consumption (47 vs 83; p = 0.001) during the first postoperative days. Acupuncture-related remedies, such as nonpharmacological treatments, have been shown to relieve pain through mechanisms that increase β-endorphin and reduce the neurotransmission of substances. P. Huang et al., [89] randomized 82 patients to receive that low-level laser acupuncture gradually reduced postoperative pain intensity (p = 0.01) and morphine consumption (p < 0.05) within the first 72 h after TKA for osteoarthritis. Low-level laser acupuncture may have benefits as an adjuvant pain management technique for clinical care. However, Petersen et al., [90] did not support the addition of acupuncture to routine rehabilitation.

Summary

With the aging of the population, there will be an increasing number of elderly patients receiving TKA. Perioperative pain management in patients undergoing TKA is very important to improve rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall outcomes. Furthermore, surgeons together with anesthesiologists must decide on perioperative pain management after TKA, taking into consideration each patient individually. At present, multimodal analgesia is the optimal analgesic regimen for TKA. Multimodal analgesia could improve perioperative pain control and patient satisfaction through the combination of several analgesic regimens while reducing opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects. However, the optimal protocol of multimodal analgesia requires further investigation in the future.

References

1. Aso K, Izumi M, Sugimura N, Okanoue Y, Kamimoto Y, Yokoyama M, et al.: Additional benefit of local infiltration of analgesia to femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: double-blind randomized control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2019 Jul;27(7):2368–74.
2. Krishna Prasad GV: Post-operative analgesia techniques after total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;14(1):85–90.
3. Hussain N, Brull R, Sheehy B, Dasu M, Weaver T, Abdallah FW: Does the addition of iPACK to adductor canal block in the presence or absence of periarticular local anesthetic infiltration improve analgesic and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):713–21.
4. Vartan CM, Romero NM, DiScala SL, Brooks A, Melendez-Benabe J, Silverman M: Retrospective Review of Perioperative Multimodal Analgesia for Orthopedic Patients in a Veterans Affairs Setting. Sr Care Pharm. 2021 Aug 1;36(8):397–408.
5. Begani MM, Mulchandani DV: Shagufta choudhary. Anesthesia in Day Care Surgery. Springer Singapore; (1; vol. XVIII, 139).
6. Pitchon DN, Dayan AC, Schwenk ES, Baratta JL, Viscusi ER: Updates on Multimodal Analgesia for Orthopedic Surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Sep;36(3):361–73.
7. Aglio LS, Abd-El-Barr MM, Orhurhu V, Kim GY, Zhou J, Gugino LD, et al.: Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in thoracolumbosacral spine operations: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):647–53.
8. Gasbjerg KS, Hägi-Pedersen D, Lunn TH, Laursen CC, Holmqvist M, Vinstrup LØ, et al.: Effect of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to multimodal pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2022 Jan 4;376:e067325.
9. Chan TCW, Cheung CW, Wong SSC, Chung AYF, Irwin MG, Chan PK, et al.: Preoperative dexamethasone for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;37(12):1157–67.
10. Li D, Zhao J, Yang Z, Kang P, Shen B, Pei F: Multiple Low Doses of Intravenous Corticosteroids to Improve Early Rehabilitation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Knee Surg. 2019 Feb;32(2):171–9.
11. Liszka H, Zając M, Gądek A: Pre-emptive analgesia with methylprednisolone and gabapentin in total knee arthroplasty in the elderly. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 11;12(1):2320.
12. Berkowitz RD, Steinfeld R, Sah AP, Mack RJ, McCallum SW, Du W, et al.: Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Meloxicam for Moderate-to-Severe Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2021 Jun 4;22(6):1261–71.
13. Ma HH, Chou TFA, Wang HY, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, et al.: An opioid-sparing protocol with intravenous parecoxib can effectively reduce morphine consumption after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7362.
14. Bian YY, Wang LC, Qian WW, Lin J, Jin J, Peng HM, et al.: Role of Parecoxib Sodium in the Multimodal Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial. Orthop Surg. 2018 Nov;10(4):321–7.
15. Laoruengthana A, Rattanaprichavej P, Reosanguanwong K, Chinwatanawongwan B, Chompoonutprapa P, Pongpirul K: A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacies of ketorolac and parecoxib for early pain management after total knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):1708–14.
16. Murata-Ooiwa M, Tsukada S, Wakui M: Intravenous Acetaminophen in Multimodal Pain Management for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3024–8.
17. O’Neal JB, Freiberg AA, Yelle MD, Jiang Y, Zhang C, Gu Y, et al.: Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen as an Adjunct to Multimodal Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3029–33.
18. Lubis AM, Maruanaya S, Tantri AR, Pontoh LAP, Ifran NNPPS: The Use of Combination Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Postoperative Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. 2021 Dec;24(8):E1199–204.
19. Xu X, Xie L, Liu H, Hu Y: Transdermal buprenorphine patch versus oral celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: An open- label, randomized controlled trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2020 Sep;106(5):915–9.
20. Londhe S, Patwardhan M, Shah R, Oak M: Efficacy and Safety of Buprenorphine Transdermal Patch for Immediate Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S178–81.
21. Juszkiewicz S, Juszkiewicz A, Kortych D: The application of local infiltration analgesia as multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain managment after total knee arthroplasty – review of the literature. 2019;84(1):33–6.
22. Nicolino TI, Costantini J, Carbó L: Complementary Saphenous Nerve Block to Intra-Articular Analgesia Reduces Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S168–72.
23. Kim DH, Beathe JC, Lin Y, YaDeau JT, Maalouf DB, Goytizolo E, et al.: Addition of Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee and Adductor Canal Block to Periarticular Injection Enhances Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):526–35.
24. Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Ajith Kumar KS, Eachempati KK, Reddy AVG: Comparative analysis of influence of adductor canal block and multimodal periarticular infiltration versus adductor canal block alone on pain and knee range of movement after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective non-randomised study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Aug;102(2):173–7.
25. Dannana CS, Apsingi S, Ponnala VK, Bollavaram VR, Boyapati G, Eachempati KK: Comparative study of the influence of adductor canal block plus multimodal periarticular infiltration versus combined adductor canal block, multimodal periarticular infiltration and intra-articular epidural catheter ropivacaine infiltration on pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Aug;104(2):201–6.
26. Altay N, Sarıkaya B, Karahan MA, Büyükfırat E, Binici O, Ertürk C, et al.: Comparison of efficacy between combined periarticular and incisional injections versus periarticular injection alone of bupivacaine for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Jul;54(4):402–7.
27. Zlotnicki JP, Hamlin BR, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Rothenberger SD, Urish KL: Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Plain Bupivacaine in Periarticular Injection for Control of Pain and Early Motion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2460–4.
28. Mont MA, Beaver WB, Dysart SH, Barrington JW, Del Gaizo DJ: Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Pain Scores and Reduces Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):90–6.
29. Wang Q, Sun J, Hu Y, Zeng Y, Hu J, Yang J, et al.: Effects of morphine on peri-articular infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2020 Dec;44(12):2587–95.
30. Cheng KY, Feng B, Peng HM, Bian YY, Zhang LJ, Han C, et al.: The analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-articular injection versus intra-articular injection in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 4;20(1):2.
31. Wang Q, Tan G, Mohammed A, Zhang Y, Li D, Chen L, et al.: Adding corticosteroids to periarticular infiltration analgesia improves the short-term analgesic effects after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2021 Mar;29(3):867–75.
32. Unver B, Yuksel E, Eymir M, Maltepe F, Karatosun V: Effect of Local Infiltration Analgesia on Functional Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Knee Surg. 2022 Mar;35(4):367–74.
33. Nassar I, Fahey J, Mitchell D: Rapid recovery following hip and knee arthroplasty using local infiltration analgesia: length of stay, rehabilitation protocol and cost savings. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):355–9.
34. Kulkarni MM, Dadheech AN, Wakankar HM, Ganjewar NV, Hedgire SS, Pandit HG: Randomized Prospective Comparative Study of Adductor Canal Block vs Periarticular Infiltration on Early Functional Outcome After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2360–4.
35. Kopitkó C, Czermann R, Orosz M, Hangody G, Kiss D, Szabó Z, et al.: A randomized comparative evaluation of local infiltration analgesia, extended nerve blocks, and conventional analgesia in pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(2):290–8.
36. Szpyra B, Konturek A, Kwiatkowski G: Prospective analysis of application of a local anesthesia of the ropivacaine and epinephrine during total knee arthroplasty. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2017;82(1):41–6.
37. Karpetas GZ, Spyraki MK, Giakoumakis SI, Fligou FG, Megas PD, Voyagis GS, et al.: Multimodal analgesia protocol for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of three different regional analgesic techniques. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):104–12.
38. McCarthy D, McNamara J, Galbraith J, Loughnane F, Shorten G, Iohom G: A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia vs. intrathecal morphine after total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):264–71.
39. Miyamoto S, Sugita T, Aizawa T, Miyatake N, Sasaki A, Maeda I, et al.: The effect of morphine added to periarticular multimodal drug injection or spinal anesthesia on pain management and functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2018 Sep;23(5):801–6.
40. Iwakiri K, Ohta Y, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, Nakamura H: Local Efficacy of Periarticular Morphine Injection in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3637–42.
41. Schotanus MGM, Bemelmans YFL, van der Kuy PHM, Jansen J, Kort NP: No advantage of adrenaline in the local infiltration analgesia mixture during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2017 Sep;25(9):2778–83.
42. Kong DY, Oh JH, Choi WR, Ko YI, Choi CH: The Impact of Epinephrine in the Periarticular Injection Cocktail using Ropivacaine for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2439–43.
43. Mayr HO, Prall WC, Haasters F, Baumbach SF, Hube R, Stoehr A: Pain relieve without impairing muscle function after local infiltration anaesthesia in primary knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Jul;139(7):1007–13.
44. Wang ZF, Xu J, Luo FQ, Yu GY, Lin Y: [The effect of visualized saphenous nerve block through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach on the analgesia after total knee arthroplasty]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 8;101(21):1592–7.
45. Laoruengthana A, Jarusriwanna A, Rattanaprichavej P, Rasamimongkol S, Varakornpipat P, Pongpirul K: Timing of periarticular injection has no effect on postoperative pain and functional recovery in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, double-blinded trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Apr 11;20(1):162.
46. Peng H, Wang W, Lin J, Weng X, Qian W, Wang W: Local Efficacy of Corticosteroids as an Adjuvant for Periarticular Cocktail Injection in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:5595095.
47. DeClaire JH, Aiello PM, Warritay OK, Freeman DC: Effectiveness of Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S268–71.
48. Hyland SJ, Deliberato DG, Fada RA, Romanelli MJ, Collins CL, Wasielewski RC: Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Standard Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Regional Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):488–94.
49. Schumer G, Mann JW 3rd, Stover MD, Sloboda JF, Cdebaca CS, Woods GM: Liposomal Bupivacaine Utilization in Total Knee Replacement Does Not Decrease Length of Hospital Stay. J Knee Surg. 2019 Sep;32(9):934–9.
50. Danoff JR, Goel R, Henderson RA, Fraser J, Sharkey PF: Periarticular Ropivacaine Cocktail Is Equivalent to Liposomal Bupivacaine Cocktail in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2455–9.
51. Dysart SH, Barrington JW, Del Gaizo DJ, Sodhi N, Mont MA: Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Early Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 24-Hour Data From the PILLAR Study. J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):882-886.e1.
52. Akesen S, Akesen B, Atıcı T, Gurbet A, Ermutlu C, Özyalçın A: Comparison of efficacy between the genicular nerve block and the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block for total knee replacement surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Mar;55(2):134–40.
53. Narejo AS, Abdulwahab F, Aqil M, Alsubaie AT, Hazazy HY, Alzahrani T, et al.: Efficacy of interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block versus periarticular local infiltration analgesia after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: Prospective randomized control trial. Saudi Med J. 2021 Oct;42(10):1065–71.
54. Abdullah MA, Abu Elyazed MM, Mostafa SF: The Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Posterior Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Block in Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2022 May;25(3):E427–33.
55. Mou P, Wang D, Tang XM, Zeng WN, Zeng Y, Yang J, et al.: Adductor Canal Block Combined With IPACK Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Function Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):259–66.
56. Patterson ME, Vitter J, Bland K, Nossaman BD, Thomas LC, Chimento GF: The Effect of the IPACK Block on Pain After Primary TKA: A Double-Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S173–7.
57. Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S, Cholwattanakul C, Lertteerawattana L, Dowkrajang S: Effect of ultrasound-guided selective sensory nerve blockade of the knee on pain management compared with periarticular injection for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. The Knee. 2021 Dec;33:1–10.
58. Vichainarong C, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S, Songborassamee N: Analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Nov;45(11):872–9.
59. Sirivanasandha B, Sutthivaiyakit K, Kerdchan T, Poolsuppasit S, Tangwiwat S, Halilamien P: Adding a low-concentration sciatic nerve block to total knee arthroplasty in patients susceptible to the adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):282.
60. Angers M, Belzile ÉL, Vachon J, Beauchamp-Chalifour P, Pelet S: Negative Influence of femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength recovery following total knee replacement: A prospective randomized trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2019 Jun;105(4):633–7.
61. Grosso MJ, Murtaugh T, Lakra A, Brown AR, Maniker RB, Cooper HJ, et al.: Adductor Canal Block Compared with Periarticular Bupivacaine Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 5;100(13):1141–6.
62. Lim YC, Quek HYK, Phoo WHJ, Mah CL, Tan S: A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty. Singapore Med J. 2019 Mar;60(3):145–9.
63. Luo ZY, Yu QP, Zeng WN, Xiao Q, Chen X, Wang HY, et al.: Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):468.
64. Wang Q, Yue Y, Li D, Yang Z, Yeersheng R, Kang P: Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined With Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1650–5.
65. Jaremko I, Lukaševič K, Tarasevičius Š, Zeniauskas L, Macas A, Gelmanas A: Comparison of 2 Peripheral Nerve Blocks Techniques for Functional Recovery and Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2021 Oct 11;27:e932848.
66. Meftah M, Boenerjous-Abel S, Siddappa VH, Kirschenbaum IH: Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. Orthopedics. 2020 Jan 1;43(1):e47–53.
67. Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S, Amarase C: Opioid-Sparing Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Combined Triple Nerve Blocks With Local Infiltration Analgesia. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):295–302.
68. Choi JW, Lahori A, Merlo JA, Gill O, Ghoddoussi F, Patel KM, et al.: Adductor Canal Blocks With Bupivacaine and Magnesium After Same-day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Postoperative Pain Relief and Decrease Opioid Consumption: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2022 Jun 1;38(6):388–95.
69. Biswas A, Perlas A, Ghosh M, Chin K, Niazi A, Pandher B, et al.: Relative Contributions of Adductor Canal Block and Intrathecal Morphine to Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):154–60.
70. Wang Q, Hu J, Zeng Y, Li D, Yang J, Kang P: Efficacy of Two Unique Combinations of Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3421–31.
71. Li D, Alqwbani M, Wang Q, Liao R, Yang J, Kang P: Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Combined With Additional Analgesic Methods for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3554–62.
72. Tak R, Gurava Reddy AV, Jhakotia K, Karumuri K, Sankineani SR: Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):155–62.
73. Wiesmann T, Hüttemann I, Schilke N, Heyse T, Efe T, Eschbach D, et al.: Ultrasound-guided single injection versus continuous sciatic nerve blockade on pain management and mobilisation after total knee arthroplasty (CoSinUS trial): A randomised, triple-blinded controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;35(10):782–91.
74. Borycka-Kiciak K, Banasiewicz T, Rydzewska G: Butyric acid – a well-known molecule revisited. Przeglad Gastroenterol. 2017;12(2):83–9.
75. Lützner J, Gehring R, Beyer F: Slightly better pain relief but more frequently motor blockade with combined nerve block analgesia compared to continuous intraarticular analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2020 Apr;28(4):1169–76.
76. Zhang Y, Tan Z, Liao R, Zhou Z, Kang P, Cheng X, et al.: The Prolonged Analgesic Efficacy of an Ultrasound-Guided Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;41(5):e607–14.
77. Wang CG, Ma WH, Liu R, Yang MY, Yang Y, Ding YL: The effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with distal interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):175.
78. Kayupov E, Okroj K, Young AC, Moric M, Luchetti TJ, Zisman G, et al.: Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Provide Superior Ambulation and Pain Control Compared to Epidural Analgesia for Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1040-1044.e1.
79. Sargant SC, Lennon MJ, Khan RJ, Fick D, Robertson H, Haebich S.: Extended duration regional analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing five days to three days of continuous adductor canal ropivacaine infusion. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 May;46(3):326–31.
80. Elkassabany NM, Cai LF, Badiola I, Kase B, Liu J, Hughes C, et al.: A prospective randomized open-label study of single injection versus continuous adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J. 2019 Mar;101-B(3):340–7.
81. Lee B, Park SJ, Park KK, Kim HJ, Lee YS, Choi YS: Optimal location for continuous catheter analgesia among the femoral triangle, proximal, or distal adductor canal after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun;47(6):353–8.
82. Chuan A, Lansdown A, Brick KL, Bourgeois AJG, Pencheva LB, Hue B, et al.: Adductor canal versus femoral triangle anatomical locations for continuous catheter analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):360–7.
83. Kim HY, Ahn JS, Park S, Choi EJ, Ri HS, Yoon JU, et al.: Comparison of catheter-over-needle and catheter-through-needle methods in ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2;100(26):e26519.
84. Turner JD, Dobson SW, Henshaw DS, Edwards CJ, Weller RS, Reynolds JW, et al.: Single-Injection Adductor Canal Block With Multiple Adjuvants Provides Equivalent Analgesia When Compared With Continuous Adductor Canal Blockade for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Equivalency Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3160-3166.e1.
85. Lee S, Rooban N, Vaghadia H, Sawka AN, Tang R: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single Injection Versus Catheter Technique. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1045–51.
86. Bugada D, Allegri M, Gemma M, Ambrosoli AL, Gazzerro G, Chiumiento F, et al.: Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term outcome after total knee replacement: A prospective, observational, multicentre study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Oct;34(10):665–72.
87. Mishra P, Edwards D, Huntoon M, Sobey C, Polkowski G, Corey J, et al.: Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):752–6.
88. Thijs E, Schotanus MGM, Bemelmans YFL, Kort NP: Reduced opiate use after total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted cryotherapy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2019 Apr;27(4):1204–12.
89. Huang CH, Yeh ML, Chen FP, Wu D: Low-level laser acupuncture reduces postoperative pain and morphine consumption in older patients with total knee arthroplasty: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2022 Jul;20(4):321–8.
90. Petersen LM, Bautista EJ, Nguyen H, Hanson BM, Chen L, Lek SH, et al.: Community characteristics of the gut microbiomes of competitive cyclists. Microbiome. 2017 Aug 10;5(1):98.

 

© Copyright by polishorthopaedics 2017 - All Rights Reserved. Wszelkie Prawa Zastrzeżone.
Cookie Policy / Polityka plików Cookie
Strony Sklepy Pozycjonowanie SEO ... Setia.pl

      Manage cookie consents / Zarządzania zgodami Cookie
      To provide you with the best experience possible, we use technologies such as cookies to store and / or access information about your device. Consent to these technologies will allow us to process data such as your browsing behavior or unique identifiers on this website. Some features and functions may be adversely affected if you do not consent or if you withdraw consent.

      Aby zapewnić jak najlepsze wrażenia, korzystamy z technologii, takich jak pliki cookie, do przechowywania i/lub uzyskiwania dostępu do informacji o urządzeniu. Zgoda na te technologie pozwoli nam przetwarzać dane, takie jak zachowanie podczas przeglądania lub unikalne identyfikatory na tej stronie. Brak wyrażenia zgody lub wycofanie zgody może niekorzystnie wpłynąć na niektóre cechy i funkcje.
      Functional / Funkcjonalne Always active
      The storage or access to technical data is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service expressly requested by the subscriber or user, or solely for the purpose of carrying out the transmission of a message over an electronic communications network. / Przechowywanie lub dostęp do danych technicznych jest ściśle konieczny do uzasadnionego celu umożliwienia korzystania z konkretnej usługi wyraźnie żądanej przez subskrybenta lub użytkownika, lub wyłącznie w celu przeprowadzenia transmisji komunikatu przez sieć łączności elektronicznej.
      Preferencje
      Przechowywanie lub dostęp techniczny jest niezbędny do uzasadnionego celu przechowywania preferencji, o które nie prosi subskrybent lub użytkownik.
      Statistics / Statystyka
      Technical storage or access that is only used for statistical purposes. / Przechowywanie techniczne lub dostęp, który jest używany wyłącznie do celów statystycznych. Przechowywanie techniczne lub dostęp, który jest używany wyłącznie do anonimowych celów statystycznych. Bez wezwania do sądu, dobrowolnego podporządkowania się dostawcy usług internetowych lub dodatkowych zapisów od strony trzeciej, informacje przechowywane lub pobierane wyłącznie w tym celu zwykle nie mogą być wykorzystywane do identyfikacji użytkownika.
      Marketing
      Storage or technical access is required for the creation of user profiles in order to send advertisements or track the user on a website or on several websites for similar marketing purposes. / Przechowywanie lub dostęp techniczny jest wymagany do tworzenia profili użytkowników w celu wysyłania reklam lub śledzenia użytkownika na stronie internetowej lub na kilku stronach internetowych w podobnych celach marketingowych.
      Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
      Zobacz preferencje
      {title} {title} {title}